|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
   |
Posted - 2011.08.14 02:02:00 -
[1]
The problem is not with the cloaker, but with the cowards that can't accept 0.0 involves risk.
|
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
|
Posted - 2011.08.14 09:05:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Cynoska McNamara
The real cryer are AFK cloackers who do not want to lose this privilege.
Considering they are at no risk of losing anything I don't see why.
Also, how do they gather intel if they are AFK?
Looking through your posts it's clear who the real crybaby is in this discussion.
|
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
|
Posted - 2011.08.14 12:41:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Cynoska McNamara
Edited by: Cynoska McNamara on 14/08/2011 12:34:43
Originally by: Dub Step
Originally by: Cynoska McNamara
The real cryer are AFK cloackers who do not want to lose this privilege.
Considering they are at no risk of losing anything I don't see why.
Also, how do they gather intel if they are AFK?
Looking through your posts it's clear who the real crybaby is in this discussion.
This shows that you do not know the purpose and how the role of AFK cloaker.
There are many tools that capture information about corporations that operate in a system. You let the logs record the names of the pilots and the ships they drive. You can check what are the best time slot to make an attack .. and much more.
And this force the players to operate always under guard, causing a slowdown in the production chain, causing harm to the economy of the alliance.
1000 hours spent AFK + 5 (random) hours spent in piracy = clock bomb effect. You have made a system unusable while you sleep peacefully, or while you're shopping (because we don't know when are you really AFK or when you are waiting for a perfect moment to strike an attack)
You will get bored waiting as we get bored waiting for you.
my logs dont show that info, maybe you should be petitioning against use of intel gathering macros, not cloaked ships doing noting.
You mention being forced to 'operate under guard'. It's 0.0, you should be doing this anyway. Why shouldn't people be able to influence your economy? This is a key element of warfare.
There is no such thing as piracy in null sec, for piracy to occur there must be laws to be broken.
Again, cloakers DO NOT make a system unusable, your coawardice and unwillingness to do anything while a random ship sits doing no harm is what makes the system unusable. Grow a pair for goodness sake. If you can't handle a single red in your system doing nothing then you don't deserve the right to use that space.
|
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
|
Posted - 2011.08.14 17:50:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Dub Step
You mention being forced to 'operate under guard'. It's 0.0, you should be doing this anyway.
Originally by: Cynoska McNamara
This shows how poor is your 0.0 life as citizen and productor. You are a pirate.. you can't understand.
You expect to have risk free ratting without protecting yourself and you claim I have the poor understanding. Laughable
Originally by: Cynoska McNamara
Your fury against this thread shows how AFK Cloaker is a necessary role to your gameplay.
Yes, my reasoned arguments show I am completely enraged by this 'threat' to cloaking. I can't even use a cloaking device and have no intention to waste electricity 'denying service' to other players.
Originally by: Cynoska McNamara
You call others "cowards" when you're the first to fear a change.
Prove that a cloak device with the fuel (or charge) ruin your game .. then you are right.
First: I don't fear anything and certainly have no reason to believe these whiny threads are ever going to lead to a change to cloaking.
Second: I can't prove a cloak device with fuel will ruin my game because it wouldn't. You probably meant something else and need to rephrase this statement.
Originally by: Cynoska McNamara
Do not hide behind your "You are a carebear".
Who's hiding? You clearly are a carebear, a pretty incompetent one at that since you can't seem to find the jumpgate next door, or simply let an afk player stop all your activity.
Furthermore I could say do not hide behind your "You are a pirate", but it's a stupid thing to say so I wont.
|
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
|
Posted - 2011.08.14 21:04:00 -
[5]
Apparently things like that are unrealistic to expect of a group of people in contestable and lawless space.
|
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
|
Posted - 2011.08.16 05:46:00 -
[6]
That illiterate crybaby mentioned something about counter-intelligence. I think he is doing a fantastic job of demonstrating counter-intelligence in this thread.
|
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
|
Posted - 2011.08.18 13:55:00 -
[7]
Anyone AFK does not represent a risk therefore why bother.
|
Dub Step
Minmatar
Death To Everyone But Us
|
Posted - 2011.08.18 14:25:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Kreliaan
This isn't about risk vs a single enemy. This is about allowing people to participate in eve while not at their computer.
Soi you would also wish for skill training to stop while offline and for market orders, industry jobs, contracts, research etc. to be cancelled while a player is offline?
|
|
|
| |
|